Search for: "Baxter v. Young"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm
Here is the abstract: In Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Young suggested that perhaps the SILS test was akin to cold fusion. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Because the presumption in Baxter has not been rebutted, the damages owed to the respondents are equivalent to the difference between the sale price received by the appellants on the resale and the price received by the respondents on the initial sale to the appellants. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:21 pm
See Chafin v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:05 pm
Hernandez v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm
I wonder if justices are more likely to retire while young and in good health when, as today, there's perceptually not much politically at stake. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
The authors of this guest post are: Doug Greene, BakerHostetler, Leader, Securities and Governance Litigation Team; Genevieve York-Erwin, BakerHostetler, Partner; Mike Tomasulo, Baldwin Risk Partners, Managing Partner, Management Liability National Practice Leader: Emily Baxter, BakerHostetler, Associate; and Alex Karambelas, BakerHostetler, Associate. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 1:12 pm
See Baxter v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 12:26 pm
Mills and Others Baxter v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:42 pm
In Stone v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
Older men in positions of power sleeping with young women in subordinate positions is also prevalent at the YMCA and, that night, Mr. [read post]
27 May 2019, 12:39 pm
Belisle v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:13 pm
Robert v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:25 am
Silvestri v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:04 pm
Because this is a case seeking the unsealing of a document, rather than seeking to vacate a protective order, Young v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 12:23 pm
” Baxter v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
” 1863: The New Zealand Settlements Act, which authorized the government to confiscate land from certain tribes without compensation, was passed. 1877: In Wi Parata v The Bishop of Wellington, the chief justice of the Supreme Court declared the Treaty to be “worthless” and a “simple nullity. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
