Search for: "Board v. Board" Results 1 - 20 of 45,467
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 7:54 pm by Adam Levitin
As Justice Thomas wrote in CFPB v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:39 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff wins in the Supreme Court because the deadline is not jurisdictional.The case is Harrow v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Indeed, a case involving one of respondent’s employees arising after enactment of Civil Service Law § 72 (1) considered and applied Education Law § 2568 without reference to the Civil Service Law (Newman v Board of Educ. of City Sch. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Indeed, a case involving one of respondent’s employees arising after enactment of Civil Service Law § 72 (1) considered and applied Education Law § 2568 without reference to the Civil Service Law (Newman v Board of Educ. of City Sch. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Magnacoustics, Inc. v Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen, 303 AD2d 561, 562). [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:00 am by Unknown
But the industry group’s main issue with the proposed legislation is that there is no need to rush a law through without full analysis and debate.The basis for the holding in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
18 May 2024, 6:30 am
In Icahn Partners v. deSouza, the Court of Chancery, in a letter opinion (Jan. 16, 2024), ruled that the Icahn-Affiliated Director was not entitled to share the information with the Icahn Funds. [read post]
18 May 2024, 6:30 am
In Icahn Partners v. deSouza, the Court of Chancery, in a letter opinion (Jan. 16, 2024), ruled that the Icahn-Affiliated Director was not entitled to share the information with the Icahn Funds. [read post]