Search for: "Boeing Co. v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2023, 7:17 pm by Michael Lowe
Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc., 770 F.2d 399, 407 (4th Cir. 1985) and United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am by Keith Szeliga and Daniel Alvarado
”[12] Importantly, there is no presumption of cost reasonableness.[13] If an initial review of the facts results in the Government challenging a specific cost, the contractor has the burden to prove that the cost is reasonable.[14] The FAR provides that whether a cost is reasonable depends on a “variety of considerations and circumstances,” including the following: Whether it is the type of cost generally recognized as ordinary and necessary for the conduct of the… [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
That may be because with this decision and earlier decisions in Marchand and In re Boeing Co. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:55 pm by Keith Szeliga and Katie Calogero
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing regulations that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The court stated that it did not need to decide whether liability existed under the prong 1 claim to dispose of the motion to dismiss, but noted that a report prepared by external counsel indicated that the company had a “woefully inadequate compliance system. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am by Camilla Hrdy
To my knowledge, as of today, Boeing and the FAA both have details about defects in software used in Boeing's 737 Max airplanes that contributed to the crashes of two 737 Max airplanes that killed hundreds of people. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:21 pm by Michael Ehline
The project is ambitious, with some of the greatest tech minds of the last century behind it, including Google co-founder Larry Page. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]