Search for: "Brown v. City of Richmond" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Two federal district courts recently upheld decisions by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (FRBKC) and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (FRBSF) to deny master account applications from Custodia Bank (Custodia) and PayServices Bank (PayServices). [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:46 am by Sasha Volokh
  But, more to the point: the Supreme Court, far from invalidating private delegations under the Article I Nondelegation Doctrine, has upheld them at least four times: in Butte City Water Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Topics include “Poll tax litigations and campaign information; Richmond Crusade For Voters literature and training materials; Prince Hall Fraternal Order of Black Freemasonry documents; Massive Resistance and the Byrd Machine; Interstate Highway System family displacement records; [and] Brown v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
Harlan’s moral vision is memorialized in his lone dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
School Board of Prince Edward County, “ordering the County to reopen and fund public schools which had been closed during the era of “Massive Resistance’ in Virginia” to Brown v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 7:00 am by Caroline Lee
Ross was also selected by Dennis Herrera, the San Francisco City Attorney, to handle Litvinova v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 5:10 am by Gail Heriot
A chairman of the Richmond School Board between 1953 and 1961 and a member of the Virginia Board of Education—the crucial years following the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:25 am by Sasha Volokh
City of Richmond, 226 U.S. 137 (1912); City of Eastlake v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 1:21 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Richmond (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 70, 101-102, for the proposition that the statute “does not require [an] appellate court to address additional alleged defects that may be addressed in a completely different and more comprehensive manner upon CEQA review following remand[.] [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am by Amy Howe
  And Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog covers yesterday’s grant in DirecTV v. [read post]