Search for: "Brown v. Public Employment Relations Bd."
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2024, 12:52 pm
Public Employment Relations Bd. (2011) 51 Cal.4th 259); home rule (County of Sonoma v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
The traditional test of the employer-employee relation is the right of the employer to control the details of the work. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
Patrick Collins, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
" And some of the employee speech protection statutes likewise allow employee speech to be restricted if the restriction relates to a BFOQ,[4] if the restriction "is reasonably and rationally related to the employment activities and responsibilities of a particular employee or a particular group of employees, rather than to all employees of the employer,"[5] if the speech is "in direct conflict with the essential business-related… [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Election Bd. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Brown] for check numbers [1001], [1002] and [1003]. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 12:21 pm
Brown v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 12:21 pm
Brown v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
Bd. of Edn., 2009-Ohio-1970, ¶ 11. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Brown, J.D. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:14 pm
Review Bd. (1981), Hobbie v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
My students Curtis Brown, Sara Liss, and Ali Vaqar worked on the brief. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 4:50 am
Local Joint Executive Bd. of Las Vegas v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 10:35 pm
The leading decision on scope of employment related to volunteers in Canada is the Nixon v. [read post]