Search for: "Butts v. City of New York"
Results 1 - 20
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2024, 3:33 am
That is particularly true of New York City’s law, which gives squatters who claim to be tenants strong rights against removal if they have been on the property for at least 30 days. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” [34] There were still cases like Brown v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:23 am
Second, the reasonable viewer, unlike when Sullivan, Butts or Gertz were decided, no longer takes the time to research and verify reporting that often is not, in fact, news. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:30 am
According to the opinions of Justices in the majority in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 7:47 am
Another case cited in Schechter Poultry as an example of an unproblematic private delegation was Butte City Water v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
Butts, which extends the actual malice requirement to public figure plaintiffs; Gertz v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:30 pm
In 1957, in Lambert v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
[A forthcoming article of mine in the New York University Journal of Law & Liberty.] [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Cigarette butts, that is. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Publisher and distributor liability is consistent with the First Amendment, despite the chilling effect it might sometimes create, so long as it complies with the New York Times v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
" Id. at 579; see also City of Inglewood v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:00 am
EHAT Corp. holds a 51% interest in EHAT LP and the New York City Economic Development Corporation holds a 49% interest in EHAT LP (id. 1111 19). [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary are as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 10:35 pm
Most verbose post: Apparently, I had a lot to say about the New York Paid Family Leave, which was one of the first of its kind in terms of government-mandated paid leave. [read post]
