Search for: "C. W. Burke"
Results 1 - 20
of 100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Edmund Burke, Reflections on the French Revolution (W. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am
This post summarizes the published criminal opinions from the Supreme Court of North Carolina released on December 15, 2023. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am
“[W]here it is claimed that a duty of disclosure violation impaired the stockholders' right to cast an informed vote, that claim is direct. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Leslie C. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Still, it would be foolish to reject Jennifer’s cautionary note tout court, just as it might be a mistake to adopt my old teacher Louis Hartz’s dismissal of Burke as an apostle of “mindless” complacence and acceptance of the status quo. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:44 pm
Contrast w/other studies of SG influence and citation rates. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 5:53 am
Burke (10th Cir. 2012) ("[W]here documents are used to determine litigants' substantive legal rights, a strong presumption of access attaches. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 8:51 am
The M/Y Johanny, 36 F.3d 136, 141 n.6 (1st Cir. 1994) (quoting James W. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 12:01 am
Leahy, Chester W. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm
G.S. 15A-1422(c)(3). [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 5:47 am
William W. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:30 am
Gerry W. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am
Integrity right misundersands relationship b/t author, text and public in way that casts disruptive dialogic engagement as moral and legal wrong; not consistent w/feminist politics of confrontation, resistance, and social reform. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:42 pm
The court went on to conclude that the policies chilled the speech of Speech First's members enough to allow the challenge to go forward: "[C]hilling a plaintiff's speech is a constitutional harm adequate to satisfy the injury-in-fact requirement. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:42 pm
The court went on to conclude that the policies chilled the speech of Speech First's members enough to allow the challenge to go forward: "[C]hilling a plaintiff's speech is a constitutional harm adequate to satisfy the injury-in-fact requirement. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 8:52 am
Gerry W. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm
Gerry W. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
” At Fox News, Ron Blitzer and Bill Mears report that “[c]onservative justices appeared to believe the issue is too murky for the court to decide how religious organizations should define religious roles. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:59 am
Dan Burk/Julie Cohen arguments against algorithmic fair use. (1) We don’t have the technology. [read post]
