Search for: "California Communities Against Toxics v. EPA"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:57 am
EPA and for the public health community. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
EPA also granted California two waivers approving recent California Air Resource Board regulations aimed at reducing transportation emissions. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
See, e.g., State of California v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
See, e.g., State of California v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Kehm v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 9:15 am
Court of Appeals or the District of Columbia has recently issued two important rulings on the Clean Air Act in particular and administrative law in general: California Communities Against Toxics, et al., v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:56 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decided the case of California Communities Against Toxics, et al. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 9:00 pm
The conservative Weekly Standard gave Trump a qualified pass on public communication and political skill, but assigned him failing grades on vision, organizational capacity, cognitive style, and emotional intelligence. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure, et al. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
EPA, that EPA, when deciding whether it was appropriate and necessary to regulate Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) such as, for instance, mercury and other toxic pollutants emitted from electric utility power plants, must consider the costs of compliance at this stage of the rulemaking proceedings. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am
District Court for the Central District of California in Los Angeles against the U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:05 pm
Dep’t of Labor, Guidance for Hazard Determination for Compliance with the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR § 1910.1200) Section V (July 6, 2007). [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:40 pm
In considering whether vacatur is warranted, we must balance these errors against the consequences of such a remedy. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:08 am
Count me as someone who agrees with the Ninth Circuit in this case that the appropriate remedy is to remand the case (as both parties recognize) but not vacate the EPA's rule in the interim. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Demonstrating the benefits of international celebrity activism through James Cameron’s campaign against the Belo Monte Dam. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
EPA, case numbers 09-1322, 10-1092 and 10-1073; and American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
