Search for: "California Employment Law Letter"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,199
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
California – California Lawmakers Keep Killing Bills by Not Voting on Them. [read post]
Blog Post: Practical Guidance Offers Help with Workplace Issues during Mental Health Awareness Month
13 May 2024, 10:00 pm
Maryland: Maryland amends its labor law to prohibit noncompete and conflict of interest clauses in employment contracts for certain veterinary and health care professionals, and to establish restrictions for noncompete clauses in certain health care employment contracts. [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:37 pm
In an April 24 letter to the state’s Employment Development Department, the company’s vice president of people, Scott Griffin, said Rivian planned to lay off more than 120 employees, including 89 in Irvine and 28 in Palo Alto. [read post]
13 May 2024, 2:12 pm
This ordinance is set to take effect on September 3, 2024, and expands upon California’s existing “Ban the Box” law by introducing additional requirements for employers. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:00 pm
A Texas attorney was contacted by someone asking for help with enforcing terms of a settlement agreement with their former employer after suffering injury on the job, claiming negligence and wrongful termination, and stating that the employer refuses to pay them. [read post]
6 May 2024, 10:43 am
In addition, as many California employers know, California labor laws and regulations are regularly changing. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:58 am
The district court granted the NLRB’s motion to transfer venue to the District Court for the Central District of California, finding that the case “concerns a California administrative proceeding regarding the actions of a California company and its California employees in California. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
Barrett Financial * 512(f) Once Again Ensnared in an Employment Ownership Dispute–Shande v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:00 am
California – California Passed a Law to Stop ‘Pay to Play’ in Local Politics. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
High Court Makes It Easier Podcast (Law 360) AI Regulations Hit New York City Podcast (Ryan Kurtz) Runaway Juries in Employment Litigation Podcast (Anthony Oncidi) Is L&E Arbitration the Answer? [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
The letter was sent the same week Trump’s hush-money trial began in New York. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:37 am
It has long been the law in California that, despite the general rule that all parties to litigation bear their own fees and costs, a litigant may obtain an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs when it is a party to an agreement that provides for such an award. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Watch now » Related Content Settlement Agreements: Initial Assessment, Drafting, and Negotiating Techniques (Pro-Employer) Understand material issues regarding employment law settlement agreements. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:51 am
” “A judge is not automatically disqualified from presiding in a case merely because the judge’s law clerk was personally involved in it during the law clerk’s prior employment (see Opinions 15-233; 15-43; 08-71). [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
Mediating Employment Claims Video Understand how to effectively mediate employment law claims on behalf of clients. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
In California, we saw the first investigative sweep in this arena with General Rob Bonta sending out letters to popular streaming apps and device companies alleging they failed to comply with California’s new privacy law. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:29 pm
Furthermore, applicants must submit an appeal within 60 days after collecting the denial letter. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:07 am
Evidence includes: Proof of lost wages e.g. letter from employer, pay stubs Medical records Photographs or video evidence Property repair estimates Accident report Don’t accept a settlement offer without consulting an attorney first. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm
Southern California Gas Company , 2024 Cal. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 10:00 pm
Federal: The NLRB holds that an employer violated the National Labor Relations Act when it discharged an employee for refusing to remove the hand-drawn letters "BLM"—the acronym for Black Lives Matter—from their work apron, finding that the employee's refusal to remove the BLM marking was a protected concerted activity under Section 7 of the NLRA. [read post]
