Search for: "California v. Texas" Results 1 - 20 of 4,368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
” In fact, the report shows, most of California will in some ways fare better than other parts of the country, such as Texas and the Southeast, which are expected to see some of the worst heat outcomes by 2050. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Vaseliou of the bar of the State of Texas, admitted pro hac vice of counsel), for Parents Defending Education, respondent.The New York Civil Liberties Union, New York (Stefanie D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Vaseliou of the bar of the State of Texas, admitted pro hac vice of counsel), for Parents Defending Education, respondent.The New York Civil Liberties Union, New York (Stefanie D. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 9:35 am by timothy-abeel
The 7.3 is a V8, which means it has eight cylinders in a V formation — the most common layout for eight-cylinder engines. [read post]
3 May 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Relevant here is the 2018 California Supreme Court case of Regents of University of California v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:52 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Chamber of Commerce in the Eastern District of Texas the following morning. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:28 pm by Ilya Somin
Homeless encampment under an overpass in Oakland, California. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm by Hugh Rennie
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court didn’t address and debunk ISL on the merits (as it later did last summer in Moore v Harper), the Court dismissed Texas’s filing on the ground that Texas lacked standing under Article III because “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections. [read post]