Search for: "Camara v. Municipal Court" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Biklen and Camara Stokes Hudson of counsel), for The New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, amicus curiae.The New York City Bar Association, New York (Amber Leary, Emily G. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Biklen and Camara Stokes Hudson of counsel), for The New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, amicus curiae.The New York City Bar Association, New York (Amber Leary, Emily G. [read post]
28 Aug 2021, 5:03 am by SHG
Third, the district court applied the wrong law when it relied on Brown v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
While these ordinances often contain a “criminal component”, municipalities rarely enforce the criminal penalties, but deem them necessary to cause compliance.Notwithstanding the laudable intentions behind this type of point of sale ordinance, and the usual reluctance of municipalities to enforce the criminal penalties associated therewith, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in Thompson V. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:54 am by admin
Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco, 387 U.S. 523 (1963). [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 9:20 pm by Patricia Salkin
Further the court stated that to the extent plaintiff alleged an unconstitutional search of her property, the court cited the United States Supreme Court decision in Camara v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 9:20 pm by Patricia Salkin
Further the court stated that to the extent plaintiff alleged an unconstitutional search of her property, the court cited the United States Supreme Court decision in Camara v. [read post]