Search for: "Carling v. Peters" Results 1 - 20 of 147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 6:41 am by Dan Bressler
” “Research Finds Companies Where Chief Legal Officer is Also Corporate Secretary Experience Fewer Incidents of Shareholder Litigation, Regulatory Violations, and Regulatory Penalties” — “The Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC) today announced its selection for the inaugural winner of the Carl Liggio Memorial Paper Competition. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name, was nothing less… [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
One of the most notable films entering the public domain on January 1, 2024, is Carl Theodor Dreyer’s silent masterpiece The Passion of Joan of Arc. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm by admin
Peter Austin has shown, by Monte Carlo simulation, that categorizing a continuous variable in a logistic regression results in inflating the rate of finding false positive associations.[11] The type I (false-positive) error rates increases with sample size, with increasing correlation between the confounding variable and outcome of interest, and the number of categories used for the continuous variables. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Even the notorious plaintiffs’ expert witness, Carl Cranor, could muster only a distanced agnosticism: “In Wells v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:59 pm by admin
Carl Cranor pays me the dubious honor of quoting my assessment of weight of the evidence (WOE) pseudo-methodology as used by lawsuit industry expert witnesses, in one of his recent publications: “Take all the evidence, throw it into the hopper, close your eyes, open your heart, and guess the weight. [read post]