Search for: "Clapp v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
In Rost v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 6:40 am
Rouses sued in Louisiana state court, and Clapp removed the case to the U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 7:41 am
In its recent unpublished decision of Rouses Enterprises, L.L.C. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Kehm v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 3:56 am
Common-Law Dissolution Plaintiff Loses Fight Over Venue Last year I wrote about a federal court’s first-impression decision in Busher v Barry in which it applied the Burford abstention doctrine to dismiss, without prejudice to refiling in state court, the minority shareholders’ claim for common-law dissolution. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 3:48 am
” Another example is the Appellate Division’s 2013 decision in Mizrahi v Cohen where, stating that “in certain circumstances, a buyout may be an appropriate equitable remedy upon the dissolution of an LLC,” the court granted the petitioning 50% member’s request to compel the other 50% member to sell his interest to the petitioner at a judicially determined value. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:19 am
The Doctrine of Common-Law Dissolution The doctrine of common-law dissolution dates back to a series of lower court opinions culminating in the Court of Appeals’ decision in Liebert v Clapp, 13 NY 2d 313 [1963]). [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am
Although Clapp used a study design known to be inaccurate and biased, Bailar touted Clapp’s research over that sponsored by members of the industry. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:06 am
Busher v Barry The question of first impression was addressed by S.D.N.Y. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 8:16 am
Contents include:Amaney Jamal & Helen V. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 10:51 am
In State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:58 am
Clapp, Ronald Crystal, David A. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Supreme Court Uproots Weeds in Garden State’s Law of Expert Witnesses” (Aug. 8, 2018). 4 2018 WL 3636867, at *20 (citing the Reference Manual 3d ed., at 597-99). 5 Cook v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am
Milward v. [read post]
