Search for: "Class Member Objectors"
Results 1 - 20
of 397
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Whether Defendants provided Individual Plaintiffs and the Class members with reasonable accommodation as required under FEHA and Title VII; and 5. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:20 am
Not every member of the public can complain of every potential breach of duty by a public body. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:41 am
“Given the near-complete overlap in class membership, [the objector] does not offer any evidence that one class was harmed by conduct that benefitted the other. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 3:56 am
It will catch you up on the latest appellate decisions by federal appellate courts and the highest courts in Delaware, New York, and Texas on antitrust, arbitration, class actions, intellectual property, securities, and other important issues in complex business and commercial disputes. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Once, the choice was between resolving these claims in a class action (subject, of course, to a class member’s right to opt out) or in bankruptcy. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 5:56 am
In doing so, the court rejected an objector’s argument that because other class members do not support the settlement, the representative plaintiffs are inadequate. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:59 am
Sotomayor opens by stating this is the first time the Court has "grant[ed] a business open to the public a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class," in this instance a gay couple. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:35 am
It essentially renders them second-class citizens who can never be sure if they will be able to secure publicly available goods and services. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:23 am
TST credibly alleges the District rescinded approval of TST's application because of TST's "controversial viewpoint and [the] objectors' reaction to that viewpoint. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 6:03 am
Since the Amended Complaint details events that identify B.L. as a parent, it appears that both B.L. and J.L.'s identities are already known to members of the MLSD and Objector 2, which weighs against proceeding by pseudonym. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:11 am
Some objectors to masks were not necessarily members of the batshit crazy libertarian right; they were conspiracy theorists who denied that COVID was even a real disease. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 10:14 am
" That's true whether the objectors are Jewish, Christian, or Muslim. [4.] [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 4:10 am
As to employees who were members of other faiths, UVA Health automatically dismissed their religious objections to the COVID-19 vaccine as insincere, as non-religious in nature, as based on “misinformation,” or as a misinterpretation of the objector’s own religious beliefs....5. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 3:06 pm
The court then certified a class of thousands of similar service members and extended this injunction to the class. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 3:34 am
The plaintiff apparently was the sole objector. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 12:19 pm
Notice to Non-Individual Class Members: Some class members were businesses that bought iPhones for their employees. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 7:48 am
That claim ... does not turn on an analysis of the class members’ individual circumstances and likely can be adjudicated class-wide.Liberty Counsel issued a press release announcing the decision. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:37 am
The opinion provides a comprehensive and careful explication of the standards and procedures that apply when class members object to settlement, including the circumstances under which objectors are entitled to discovery. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:46 am
But Gallo/Wynne simultaneously advised certain putative Caves class members to join the proposed settlement, which necessarily seems to require the position, contrary to that of Objector Vasquez, that the settlement is fair, is adequate, is reasonable, and that, therefore, the settlement should be approved. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:05 am
The "finding" says nothing about the religious concepts of, for example, accepting a personal benefit from evil, assisting someone in profiting from evil, cooperating in evil, appropriation of evil, de-sensitization to evil, moral contamination by intimacy with evil, ratification of evil, complicity with evil, or other considerations undoubtedly familiar to a theologian and likely familiar to a thoughtful and religious lay person who has contemplated evil.The court issued a preliminary… [read post]
