Search for: "Clayton v. US" Results 1 - 20 of 970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2024, 11:42 am by bklemm@foley.com
They also argued that the landmark 2020 Supreme Court decision that the EEOC relied upon, Bostock v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
The panel said that, “[u]sing the tools of history and tradition to which the Supreme Court directed us in [District of Columbia v.] [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The FTC alleges that the execution of the parties’ merger agreement was, and the proposed acquisition would be, an “unfair method of competition” in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act and that the effect of the proposed acquisition “may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly” in violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 1:53 pm by James A. Holt and Veronica Miclot
Clayton County The Guidance also addresses the expansion of Title VII’s coverage concerning sex and gender under Bostock v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
It comes on the heels of new guidance from the ICO on biometric use in the workplace. [read post]