Search for: "Columbia Aircraft Company v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Many fundamentals of law and procedure do remain constant for some time, but, as the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council of the United Kingdom has said, the Canadian Constitution and, by extension, the law itself, are expected to change and evolve. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Weber Aircraft Corp., 465 U.S. 792, 802 (1984); Federal Open Market Committee of Federal Reserve System v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
Therefore, Gul asserted that the United States had lost the authority to detain him at all. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:38 am
Domestically, in the United States, calls to designate Russia as a State Sponsor of Terrorism (SST) have intensified; they’ve been echoed by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, too. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
The budget also called for $34.4 billion for nuclear modernization to help fund a Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine and a Ground Based Strategic Deterrent missile. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
Other companies of note include the Aviation Industry Corporation of China, a state-owned enterprise (SOE) that is apparently the “sole supplier of military aircraft to the PLA”; and the China Communications Construction Company, an SOE that has been identified as being involved in the creation of the artificial islands in the South China Sea used by the Chinese military. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:18 pm
First chronologically, the City of Los Angeles, owner and operator of Los Angeles International Airport (“LAX”), brought suit in December 2019, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, challenging a southerly shift in flight tracks of departing aircraft from Bob Hope (Hollywood-Burbank) Airport, City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 11:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia’s ruling in United States of America v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court case Weyerhaeuser v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
Sikorsky Aircraft, Inc.).Ms. [read post]
9 May 2016, 1:38 pm
” [7] United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am
He cited the Geneva Conventions and DoD rules which state that “‘persons parachuting from aircraft in distress’ are considered hors de combat” and cannot be intentionally fired upon. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
It appears that Fokker deliberately misused this exception to justify shipments from the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 6:12 am
In the United States, there were numerous bills introduced in Congress that would regulate the collection or use of location information (see e.g,. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:41 am
United States, No. 95-2301 (2012) is a major setback. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:41 am
United States, No. 95-2301 (2012) is a major setback. Â [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:04 am
– Sosa v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:36 am
The attorneys, including Cleary partner Juan Morillo, said in the court papers that Nguema, the son of the country’s president, legally acquired the Gulfstream G-V aircraft that the federal prosecutors wants to seize. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:02 pm
Based on a statement of interest filed by the State Department with the court, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the matter of La Reunion Aerienne v. [read post]
