Search for: "Comfort v. Comfort"
Results 1 - 20
of 5,272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
The Court observed that the disclosures about the second advisor’s role ‘do not sit comfortably’ with corresponding accounts in the minutes, and it cautioned boards, committees and their advisors to take care in accurately describing events and roles played by board and committee members and their advisors – but the Court declined to “pile on” another basis for reversal. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
That may give parties (at least some) comfort when relying on confidential information in written statements. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:05 pm
For example, in University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm
In the following guest post, James L. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:26 am
But that is little comfort for the defendant. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:20 am
See James v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 4:13 am
The Supreme Court, in its recent Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
See James v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:11 am
” O’Brien v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:05 pm
Although Tam has appealed the Court of Appeal judgment, this offers little comfort. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
” The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Egilman always struck me as a bit too pudgy and comfortable really to yearn for a Spartan workers’ paradise. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:55 am
Here is the abstract: Nearly thirty years ago Justice Scalia’s Tanner lectures identified Holy Trinity Church v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:34 am
(Doe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court, Republic of Arg. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
During the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
That’s some cold comfort! [read post]