Search for: "Commonwealth v. Poole, S." Results 1 - 20 of 78
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2024, 5:50 am by Natalia Kubesch
In addition, opportunities for civil society or victim groups to intervene during criminal proceedings to advocate for compensation are limited, as highlighted in Nigeria v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 12:08 pm by Brian E. Barreira
Media outlets in Massachusetts picked up on Attorney Morrissey’s public statements and repeated his view of the facts, potentially poisoning the jury pool against the defendant. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:11 pm by Brian Shiffrin
For a defendant's constitutional rights to be meaningful, the exclusionary rule must apply (see generally People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by Frank Cranmer
The Chiswick & Brentford Gazette indicated that under the water-savings regulations at that time, it was uncertain whether the baptismal pool could be filled with 250 gallons of water for full-immersion baptisms – i.e. whether the pool equated to a swimming pool and, if so, whether it was for public or private use. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 4:53 am by Al Saikali
Do you remember watching the opening credits of DuckTales as a kid and marveling at Scrooge McDuck diving into his pool of gold coins? [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 4:47 pm by Maria Hook
The Board’s reliance on Government of India v Taylor [1955] AC 491 (HL) in this context is unhelpful. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
This guidance closely tracks IRS Notice 2018-88 and provides that an ICHRA offers “affordable” coverage if the difference between the amount of the reimbursement available through the ICHRA and the cost of self-only coverage for the lowest cost silver plan available to the employee on the ACA Exchange (in other words, an employee’s out-of-pocket cost for coverage on the ACA Exchange after reimbursement from the ICHRA, if the employee purchases the lowest cost silver plan)… [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
A six-decade-old U.S. economic embargo on Cuba has also remained officially intact.With Monday’s announcement, the administration made clear that it was not only acting because of what the State Department official called “the Cuban state’s repression of its own people” but also to send a message about Havana’s role in Venezuela. [read post]