Search for: "Construction Materials Pacific LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 79
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  Below is a brief snapshot of the status of some of these challenges: Cemex (Union Representation Rules):  Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, is awaiting oral argument in the U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:49 am by James A. Holt and Brianna Schmid
This was predicted in our prior article about the NLRB’s decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, which established a new framework for the union representation process. [read post]
Second, the Board issued a decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, 372 NLRB No. 130 (August 25, 2023), which announced a new process when a union or employees believe that a majority of employees wish to be represented. [read post]
As recently discussed, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued a major decision this summer in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, 372 NLRB No. 130 (2023). [read post]
As we previously reported and discussed here, the Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC ruling has dramatically changed the threshold that will prompt the National Labor Relation Board (“NLRB”) to issue mandatory bargaining orders and is going to have a significant impact on the manner in which employers may respond to union organizing efforts. [read post]
As we recently discussed, the National Labor Relation Board’s (“NLRB”) monumental ruling in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, 327 NLRB No. 130 (2023), is going to have a significant impact on the manner in which employers may respond to union organizing efforts. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 6:10 am by Andrew L. Levy and Adam Santucci
The National Labor Relations Board issued a groundbreaking decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC that will likely leave employers reeling. [read post]
  On August 25, 2023, the Board released its decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC, 372 NLRB No. 130 (2023), which falls short of a complete revival of the Joy Silk doctrine, but overrules existing precedent and establishes an easier way for unions to establish representation. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 1:00 pm by James A. Holt and Cheryl Blount
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued a decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC announcing a new framework for determining when employers are required to bargain with unions without a representation election. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:45 am by Eric B. Meyer
On Friday, the National Labor Relations Board issued a decision in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific, LLC that it claims in this press release will “effectuate employees’ right to bargain through representatives of their choosing and improve the fairness and integrity of Board-conducted elections. [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:43 pm by Arianna Morseau
Trident Partners, LLC Tribal Prosecutor. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 8:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Railroad Impact Mitigation Howard Terminal is bounded to the north by Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRR) railroad tracks that uniquely run down the middle of an urban street (Embarcadero West) at grade, and those tracks are used by an average of 46 trains daily between 11 a.m. and 11 p.m. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 7:23 am by E. Danya Perry
In the last month, the array of investigations involving Donald J. [read post]
In a brief filed in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific LLC, the General Counsel argued that the Board should forgo 50 years of precedent by reverting to the Joy Silk doctrine. [read post]
As foreshadowed by her August 2021 memo on Mandatory Submissions to Advice, in a brief filed in Cemex Construction Materials Pacific LLC, the Office of the NLRB General Counsel argued that the Board should reinstate an antiquated Board standard that was rejected more than 50 years (since 1969)—the Joy Silk doctrine—that would require employers to recognize and bargain with a union if it is presented with signed authorization cards from a majority of… [read post]
” The County found the impacts to be less-than-significant, as a result of the various temporary evacuation routes that could be employed under different scenarios and testimony from the County Sheriff’s Emergency Services Office and the County’s Fire Protection District, which had concluded that the available evacuation options, including a potential temporary emergency access easement that would bypass the bridge construction and re-connect Newtown Road, were sufficient… [read post]
” The County found the impacts to be less-than-significant, as a result of the various temporary evacuation routes that could be employed under different scenarios and testimony from the County Sheriff’s Emergency Services Office and the County’s Fire Protection District, which had concluded that the available evacuation options, including a potential temporary emergency access easement that would bypass the bridge construction and re-connect Newtown Road, were sufficient… [read post]