Search for: "Cook v. Rockwell International"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2022, 1:03 am
Cooking food to a temperature of 185∞F or higher will inactivate hepatitis A. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Kehm v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
Another vacuous response to a methodological challenge under Rule 702 is to label the challenge as “going to the weight, not the admissibility” of the challenged expert witness’s testimony. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am
Rockwell International The litigation over radioactive contamination from the Colorado Rocky Flats nuclear weapons plant is illustrative of the retrograde tendency in some federal courts. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 8:01 am
Cook. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
Perma Research & Development v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:05 am
<> Cook v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
”) (internal citations omitted). [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 10:24 am
See Schwartzwald ¶¶ 25-26 (citing and quoting Supreme Court decisions in Rockwell International v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Rockwell Internat’l Corp., 580 F. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:07 pm
Justice Freeman asked why the Court shouldn't follow Rockwell International Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm
Threats to internal validity, such as confounding, in a study may make reliance upon it unreasonable. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm
In Cook v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 8:59 pm
RMSE 3d at 561 n.34 (citing Cook v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
Rockwell International, 10-1377, which presents a nearly identical issue. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
And finally, in Cook v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 12:12 pm
Merilyn Cook, et al. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:43 am
Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' replyAmicus brief of Constitutional Law ProfessorsAmicus brief of Specialty Wine RetailersAmicus brief of National Taxpayers UnionCVSG Information:Invited: October 3, 2011 Cook v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
Rockwell International (10-1377); Fein v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:14 pm
Rockwell International Corp.Docket: 10-1377Issue(s): (1) Whether state substantive law controls the standard of compensable harm in suits under the Price-Anderson Act, or whether the Act instead imposes a federal standard; and (2) whether, if a federal standard applies, a property owner whose land has been contaminated by radioactive plutonium, resulting in lost property value, must show some “physical injury” to the property beyond the contamination itself in order to… [read post]
