Search for: "Cooper v. Scott*"
Results 1 - 20
of 468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
” A crowning achievement of Reconstruction and a self-conscious repudiation of the Supreme Court’s egregiously wrong ruling in Dred Scott (holding that Black persons, whether free or enslaved, could not be citizens of America), this clause constitutionally guarantees citizenship for “all persons” who are “born . . . in the United States” and who are “subject to [its] jurisdiction. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 9:00 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
15 Feb 2025, 4:51 pm
Consider the case of United State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 3:00 am
Cooper, __ F. 4th __, 2025 WL 397116 (8th Cir. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 10:26 pm
Doe; Brazilian Worker Center, Inc; La Colaborativa v. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
Transacting parties should assume that regulatory review processes will be burdensome, and while appropriate drop-dead dates may shorten, one area deserves prompt regulatory action— eliminating or revising the amended filing and disclosure requirements under the Hart-Scott- Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, which dramatically expanded the information, effort and time required to commence HSR review, with little, if any, relevant benefit to the agencies. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 2:23 pm
Pix credit New York Times America’s sovereignty is under attack. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 8:27 am
Super. 1988) (en banc) and Newkirk v. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 10:23 pm
Second, Roberts offers this account of the Bank of the United States debate and McCulloch v. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 9:01 pm
For example, the Supreme Court’s infamous ruling in Korematsu v. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 4:51 am
In the National Constitution Center’s Interactive Constitution, legal scholars John McGinnis and Peter Shane looked at the origins of the Recess Appointments Clause and how the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 8:31 pm
Eventually, the contest was narrowed down to three finalists: Paul Clement of Bancroft PLLC; Miguel Estrada of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher; and Chuck Cooper of Cooper & Kirk. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
That's because under NLRB v. [read post]
20 Oct 2024, 10:30 pm
In the case of Ungarean v. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 2:50 am
IPSO 01118-24 Barrowman v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy, No breach – after investigation 03617-24 Senvardar v The Mail on Sunday, 1 Accuracy, 2 Privacy, No breach – after investigation Statements in open court and apologies As aforementioned, on Friday 11 October 2024 there was a Statement in Open Court in the case of Vine v Barton KB-2024-000733. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm
” While the SEC has often asserted its willingness to give cooperation credit in the resolution of its enforcement actions, [11] it has historically been less forthcoming in providing meaningful guidance on how such cooperation should be translated to real world situations. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Turner v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 8:05 am
Lynn Scott, LLC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 5:33 pm
” United States v. [read post]
A Presidential Proclamation to End the Iraq War: Unilateral Executive Action to Defang a Zombie AUMF
20 Aug 2024, 6:05 am
As recounted by Scott Anderson (here and here), successive U.S. presidents have relied upon the 2002 Iraq AUMF, often (and recently almost always) in conjunction with other legal authorities, to fight Shia armed groups such as the Mahdi Army and Iranian-backed militias as well as al-Qaeda in Iraq. [read post]
