Search for: "Correll v. Scott"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm
A. v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 1:23 pm
“[I]nferring bad faith based on the racial effects of a political gerrymander in a jurisdiction in which race and partisan preference are very closely correlated” would, Alito suggested, allow litigants and courts to circumvent the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Rucho v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Winter was coming, as it does. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
District Court (Eastern District of Michigan) in the King v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
October 20, 2023 Clients, Friends, and Associates: As we end the third quarter and enter the fall season, we would like to highlight some of the recent industry updates and occurrences we found to be both interesting and impactful. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:35 am
This note provides some suggestions for lawyers taking family law cases to arbitration, offered from my perspective as a family law arbitrator. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 1:26 pm
But few condemn United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:47 am
From Gregory v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
See Chiarella v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
Thank you Thomas [Kim] for that lovely introduction and I’m very pleased to be here at the Securities Regulation Institute giving the Alan B. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Is that mere correlation or of any causal significance? [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:55 am
Source: Methodology derived from Council on State Taxation, “50-State Study and Report on Telecommunications Taxation,” May 2005; updated July 2021 from state statutes, FCC data, and local ordinances by Scott Mackey, Leonine Public Affairs LLP, Montpelier, VT. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:04 pm
The other will be Scott Walter of the Capital Research Center. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 3:05 pm
Next up is Birt v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:53 pm
” Goodwin v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 3:09 am
See Scott v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, which examines questions of federalism in the context of eminent domain proceedings. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 11:18 am
Its new counsel is Scott Millerof MBM Intellectual Property Law LLP.Now, more than four years after the beginning of the “litany of litigation”, as I have called it, that has comprised 17 cases against the Federal government and its agencies, Blacklock’s is seeking in the motion returnable on December 12, 2018 to:· Amend old pleadings to add a new cause of action involving circumvention of technical protection measures. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 1:01 pm
Neal Katyal, Paul Clement and Scott Keller each had three wins in closely decided cases. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:30 am
Unfortunately, however, my only dealings with Scott Pollins have been on continuing legal education panels. [read post]
