Search for: "Cross v. Bear" Results 1 - 20 of 2,040
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
‘The Lost King’ was found by HHJ Lewis to bear the meaning that (i) the claimant knowingly misrepresented facts to the media and the public about the University’s role in finding Richard III’s remains and marginalising Langley’s role; and (ii) the claimant was “smug, unduly dismissive and patronising” towards Ms Langley in relation to the project. 5RB summarised the ruling. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
But one also needs to cross refer to other subsections that were introduced and which define the parameters and operation of this provision. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
  In addition, it bears a case number and refers to the materials tested as exhibits and as evidence. [read post]
The full media release can be accessed here. 3             The Federal Court finds that a term in Auto & General Insurance Company’s contracts is not unfair On 22 March 2024, the Federal Court in ASIC v Auto & General Insurance Company limited [2024] FCA 272 handed down the first decision to apply the unfair contract terms (UCT) regime in the context of insurance since its expansion to insurance policies on 5… [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
(Editor’s Note: This article is part of our new symposium on the ICC and Israel-Hamas war.) [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
On these facts the cross-reference to Kern was too general, and the anticipation attack failed (neither document alone contained a clear and unambiguous disclosure). [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am by Mutasim Ali
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:35 am by SHG
On the other hand, the threat of a cross-examination highlighting these untested allegations undermined defendant’s right to testify. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 11:28 pm by Adeline Chong
The Appellate Division of the Singapore High Court has recently refused permission to appeal against the first instance decision.[13] It bears pointing out that the same issue of ownership of the assets of the DC Funds was before the BVI court in the insolvency proceedings. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by News Desk
The firm considered “allergen cross contamination” at the packaging/filling processing step; however, they determined that the hazard was not significant. [read post]