Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 16,529
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
First, the UK Government has been exemplary in ensuring the “seamless continuity” of the HCCH 2005 Choice of Court Convention throughout the uncertainties of the whole withdrawal process, as evidenced by the UK’s declarations and Note Verbale to the depositary Kingdom of the Netherlands.[17] The same applies mutatis mutandis to the HCCH 1965 Service Convention, to which all EU Member States are parties, and the HCCH 1970 Evidence Convention, which has only been ratified so… [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Defendant cross-moved for summary judgment seeking declaratory judgment in its favor on the constitutionality of Executive Law § 94. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Defendant cross-moved for summary judgment seeking declaratory judgment in its favor on the constitutionality of Executive Law § 94. [read post]
10 May 2024, 10:45 am by Unknown
"Mandated economic self-sufficiency from state and refugee perspectives: refugee integration policy and practice in Sweden and New Zealand," Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Latest Articles, 1 May 2024 [open access] Plan Nacional de Reasentamiento y Vías Complementarias de Admisión a la República Argentina para personas refugiadas, apátridas y necesitadas de protección internacional (Comisión Nacional Para Los… [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
On these facts the cross-reference to Kern was too general, and the anticipation attack failed (neither document alone contained a clear and unambiguous disclosure). [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
Weinstein also chose not to testify after the judge granted prosecutors permission to cross-examine him about a wide range of uncharged conduct, in rulings that gave the state’s highest court pause. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am by Mutasim Ali
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]