Search for: "Cross v. US Postal Service"
Results 1 - 20
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
Community Financial Services Ass’n. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
Community Financial Services Ass’n. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 10:35 am
Postal Service’s website and printouts from an official state board of education’s website are considered public records for hearsay purposes. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Postal Service. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 1:40 am
That aspect of our work with foreign partners allowed us a cross-border reach at a remarkable speed and scale. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 11:20 am
[x] In United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 2:59 pm
[x] In United States v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:51 pm
§ 841 as it crosses the Texas state line at some point and enters into the federal jurisdiction. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:01 pm
Representing the Postal Service, U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:33 am
Postal Service or a common carrier to distribute abortion medication. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am
Department of Justice (“DOJ”) opined that the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) could still mail medications used for abortion because DOJ interpreted the Comstock Act to apply to “unlawful use. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am
Florida and the plaintiffs will cross-appeal the 11th Circuit ruling to the Supreme Court in the very near future. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
Canada The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is dismissed in Canadian Union of Postal Workers v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Conflicts between US law and PRC state secrets laws also arise through US courts’ civil litigation discovery processes. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:35 pm
Postal Serv., 143 F.3d 1475, 1481 (Fed. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:52 am
There are, of course, obvious distinctions between the postal service, phone companies and the internet. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
A peculiarity—at least to US eyes—is that in the English legal system, certain private entities can serve as prosecutors. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
A peculiarity—at least to US eyes—is that in the English legal system, certain private entities can serve as prosecutors. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am
It was also discussed in the judgments C-507/17, Google v CNIL; and Case C-136/17 that a data subject should have a “right to be forgotten” where the retention of such data infringes the Directive 95/46 and the GDPR. [read post]
