Search for: "D12"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
T 0438/19 of 27-06-2023 referred the following questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal for decision:1. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:56 pm
At the 18 March 2021 meeting of the Advisory Council, the Department presented its first eight proposals. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 6:07 am
D12-05 at 1-3 (emphasis in original, except in last paragraph where emphasis added). [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 7:22 pm
Recall that the original SSDI eligibility ban was poorly drafted, see D12-05, and the Commission held in Gary Kluczynski, UI Hearing No. 14400214AP (30 May 2014) that this original ban on receiving unemployment benefits only applied to the week in which SSDI [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
D12 et D13 ont été déposés avec le mémoire de recours. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:00 pm
Le document D12 a été cité pour la première fois dans le mémoire de recours. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 8:36 am
If the board considered that a further distinguishing feature resided in the interrogation/analysis being carried out on the concentrated microbial agent, this was also obvious in view of D5 and D12. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:08 pm
Documents D12 and D22 showed that these parameters were essential to the polymerization process. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am
Documents D12 and D13 were submitted.V. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:10 am
Documents D12 and D13 were submitted.V. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
Moreover, there was no convincing proof that D11 was prior art, because there were some discrepancies between this document and D12, which was meant to prove its date of publication. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 12:20 am
Moreover, there was no convincing proof that D11 was prior art, because there were some discrepancies between this document and D12, which was meant to prove its date of publication. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 9:19 am
Discuss both these questions in D12.Things to Think AboutThink about a conflict in your own community. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:46 am
This case concerns an appeal by an opponent against a decision of the opposition division rejecting an opposition filed by the opponent/appellant.The patent in suit relates to a tougher polymer composition used for making moulded articles with injection moulding. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:46 am
This case concerns an appeal by an opponent against a decision of the opposition division rejecting an opposition filed by the opponent/appellant.The patent in suit relates to a tougher polymer composition used for making moulded articles with injection moulding. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:19 am
Appeal proceedingsThe petitioner filed an appeal together with new documents (D7 to D12). [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:19 am
Appeal proceedingsThe petitioner filed an appeal together with new documents (D7 to D12). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:51 am
See D12-01 at 3. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 9:00 pm
En recours, la Requérante (opposante) avait fourni plusieurs nouveaux documents, dont un document D12 censé détruire la nouveauté. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 9:00 pm
L'Opposante avait soumis un document D12, état de la technique selon l'Art 54(3) CBE un peu plus de 3 mois avant la procédure orale de recours, et environ 2 mois après la convocation à ladite procédure orale. [read post]
