Search for: "DC Precision, Inc. v. US Government" Results 1 - 20 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2022, 6:38 am by Jennifer González
However, the precise definition of obscenity was unclear, and the Supreme Court would not rule that obscenity was not constitutionally protected speech until Roth v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
  The case, In Re Valsartan, Losartan, and Irbesartan Products Liability Litigation (US DC NJ) MDL No. 2875 (RBK)is a products liability case that concerns the sale in the U.S. of generic, prescription Valsartan pharmaceuticals, found by the Food and Drug Administration [“FDA”] to contain cancer‐causing contaminants. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
In its most recent manifestations one sees the imposition of public pressure on the National Basketball Association and on Apple Inc. respecting their entanglement in Xinjiang that increasingly serves as the defining point for the difference between US and Chinese normative approaches to public governance; here and here). [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
Mike Nagata, senior vice president of CACI International Inc.; retired Lt. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am by Josh Blackman
" We also think that similar concerns animated the recent remand order in the DC Circuit's Emoluments Clause case: Blumenthal v. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
The European Parliament's shadow rapporteur Dietmar Köster said "The reform of copyright also concerns linguistic precision - a distinction should be made between Anglo-American copyright and continental European authors' rights. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Michal Freedman, and Leon Gordis, “Reference Guide on Epidemiology,” in Federal Judicial Center, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence 549, 612 (Wash., DC 3d ed., 2011). [read post]