Search for: "DEAN V. DEAN, JR."
Results 1 - 20
of 350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Once appointed, a member "may be removed by majority vote of [defendant] for substantial neglect of duty, misconduct in office, violation of the confidentiality restrictions set forth in [Executive Law § 94], inability to discharge the powers or duties of office or violation[s] of [Executive Law § 94]" (Executive Law § 94 [4] [c]).Prior to appointment, all nominations are reviewed by the independent review committee (hereinafter IRC), which consists of the deans of… [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Once appointed, a member "may be removed by majority vote of [defendant] for substantial neglect of duty, misconduct in office, violation of the confidentiality restrictions set forth in [Executive Law § 94], inability to discharge the powers or duties of office or violation[s] of [Executive Law § 94]" (Executive Law § 94 [4] [c]).Prior to appointment, all nominations are reviewed by the independent review committee (hereinafter IRC), which consists of the deans of… [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:00 am
In the past day, the encampment, which sits between John V. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In Part One, we laid out the larger First Amendment framework in which the dispute might be located and discussed how the Court’s language and reasoning in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In 1969, in Tinker v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has opined (see, e.g., Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Ewald Jr. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Apprendi, Jr. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm
Huddleson, Jr. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm
Epps, Jr., Preparing for a Federal Jury Trial (2023). 34. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 6:15 am
"—Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean and Jesse H. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 4:45 am
Kennedy Jr. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court observed in Forsyth County v. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
Supremes are reviewing in the pending Moore v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 2:01 pm
Here, they pose with Dean Thomas J. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 9:02 pm
For example, a university taking and announcing a position on the (contested) issue of how easy it should be for foreign graduate students to obtain visas (something that distinctively affects the university itself—and not just its population—as an institution) seems very different to us than weighing in on the correctness of last year’s Second Amendment ruling by the Supreme Court ruling striking down New York’s public-carry law or the Court’s Dobbs ruling overturning… [read post]
