Search for: "DIAMOND DRUG CO. v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:44 am by Emma Snell
  The Justice Department yesterday announced a task force aimed at identifying ways to protect reproductive rights in the wake of the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm by Ad Law Defense
In a similar case filed against Blue Diamond in California state court but transferred to the U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:08 pm by Ad Law Defense
In a similar case filed against Blue Diamond in California state court but transferred to the U.S. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
The order marks the first time the issue of same-sex marriage has come back to the justices since they issued an opinion last June clearing the way for same-sex couples to marry nationwide" (Ariane de Vogue and Jeremy Diamond, SCOTUS: Kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses, CNN Politics, August 31, 2015). [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:48 am by Schachtman
Drug Safety 413 (2015); Kimberly A. [read post]