Search for: "DIXON III v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2024, 5:27 am
State v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 9:12 am
State v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 9:02 am
Pharmacies cannot provide Schedule II, III, and IV drugs without a prescription, and pharmacies can only provide Schedule V drugs to customers if medically necessary. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:40 pm
Dixon Construction Limited v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
Dixon Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
Kaye v Lees (2023) EWHC 152 (KB) We’ve seen previous instalments in this matter here and here. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 11:05 am
Dixon v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
So, with regard to the topic of the Cope-Versteeg essay, one obvious question is simply whether part of “American exceptionalism” is what I often call “full-life” tenure for members of its apex courts (as, well, of course, as all so-called “Article III” federal courts). [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
Teague was authored by Phil Dixon. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am
”[6] The court’s stated standard is much less interesting than its reasoning process, which goes 2020. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
Bethel v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
Dixon noted that Ali v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:15 am
A more recent example of a Tax Court violation of judicial norms was revealed by Ballard v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The review examines the overall state of the domestic news market, its financial sustainability, the role of digital advertising and social media. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 10:17 am
The Court also noted the NZ Supreme Court decision in R v Dixon [2015] NZSC 147 [see here], holding that digital CCTV footage was both a ‘document’ and ‘property’ under the NZ Crimes Act 1961. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:20 pm
(Dixon v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
