Search for: "David J. Barber"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2023, 9:25 am
He did a short stint in […] The post A Butcher, A Barber and Ma’s Tavern: The Shestokas Story appeared first on David J. [read post]
23 May 2007, 4:19 pm
David Warner Hagen, Retired U.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Barber, Stan O. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:30 pm
Barber, The Fallacies of States' Rights (2013), David Brian Robertson, Federalism and the Making of America (2012) and Erin Ryan, Federalism and the Tug of War Within (2011). [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 8:39 am
Barber II by Juan R. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 11:29 am
J. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 12:21 pm
Econ (1997) David Ikenberry and Joself Lokonishok, Corporate Governance Through the Proxy Contest: Evidence and Implications, 66 J. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Feb. 19, 2018 Williamson, J.), Judge David J. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
Barber of Phillip D. [read post]
8 May 2012, 2:00 pm
Capalino, Curtis Cole*, Theresa Doherty*, Steven Eisenstadt, Gail Erickson, Barbara J. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
Counsel David Sherborne told the judge that the cases brought against Mirror Group Newspapers were “exceptional”, compared to other privacy actions. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:15 pm
David S. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 6:01 am
Sam Barber. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
David Allen Green reports here for the New Statesman. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
Canada On 16 January 2015, Funt J gave judgment in the libel and privacy case of Batyka v Barber 2015 BCSC 63. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 3:28 am
Johnson, David B. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:49 pm
Feb. 19, 2018 Williamson, J.), Judge David J. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am
Along with David H. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
He concluded by accepting the submission by Mr David Price for the defendant that “whatever definition of “defamatory” is adopted, it must include a qualification or threshold of seriousness, so as to exclude trivial claims” [89]. [read post]