Search for: "David Johnson v. State of Mississippi" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm by Josh Blackman
David McKnight's influential treatise observed that "[i]t is obvious that . . . the President is not regarded as 'an officer of, or under, the United States,' but as one branch of 'the Government.'" In Mississippi v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
The federal law was clearly (indeed obviously) unconstitutional under Johnson, and the Supreme Court so held in 1990 in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
Bush Presidential Center and the next day held a conversation with Mark Updegrove of the Lyndon Baines Johnson Foundation. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
Apostle Johnson Suleman, president and founder of Omega Fire Industry, has filed a N1 billion libel claim against Stephanie Otobo. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the December 9, 2016, and January 6, 2017, conferences)   Johnson v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:21 am by Joy Waltemath
” Here, “by committing an ever-increasing amount of State funds to paying State employee salaries or overtime,” the federal executive “can unilaterally deplete State resources, forcing the States to adopt or acquiesce to federal policies, instead of implementing State policies and priorities. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:45 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court issued a per curiam opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Kali Borkoski
This morning the Court issued opinions in Johnson v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 3:29 pm by Lorene Park
Regardless of its impeachment value, it should have been disclosed to opposing counsel and listed in the proposed pre-trial order; since it was not, it could not be used at trial (David v. [read post]