Search for: "Dinkins v. Dinkins" Results 1 - 20 of 41
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The topic of malapportionment is well-trodden ground, with established measures borne both of legal necessity following Baker v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  When the working class threatened the interests of robber barons in late nineteenth century, for example, the illiterate and semiliterate poor were kept from the polls through literacy tests and poll taxes, not unlike the restrictive voter identification laws introduced after the Shelby County v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 1:42 pm by Daily Record Staff
Environmental law — Voluntary Cleanup Program — Private cause of action Appellants Ruth Sherrill, Sherry Moore-Edmonds, Elizabeth Arnold, Merab Rice, Tim Bull, and Julia Dinkins (collectively, “Appellants”) filed suit in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City seeking a declaratory judgment, mandamus, and a permanent injunction against any construction activities on several lots of waterfront property ... [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court denied the County's motion and confirmed the arbitrator’s decision against the County, sustaining the arbitrator's award of $27,049.20 against Nassau.The Appellate Division subsequently rejected the County’s appeal of the Supreme Court's ruling.The court said that an arbitration award violates public policy “only where a court can conclude, without engaging in any extended fact-finding or legal analysis, that a law prohibits the particular matters to be… [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 2:30 pm by Joe Patrice
Yes… Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Brooklyn Law School, David Dinkins, Election Law, Football, Free Speech, Larry Lessig, Lawrence Lessig, McCutcheon v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 11:52 am
Because the charge instructs the jury on the law applicable to the case, it must contain an accurate statement of the law and set out all essential elements of the offense, Dinkins v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 2:25 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(6) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A statement offered against a party that wrongfully caused — or acquiesced in wrongfully causing — the declarant’s unavailability as a witness, and did so intending... [read post]