Search for: "District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Thirty-five states and the District of Columbia use ad valorem taxes; only seven states assess a flat surcharge; and two states levy both an ad valorem tax and a flat-dollar surcharge. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am by John Elwood
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455, involving bus-advertisement policies that prohibit religious themes, Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined by Thomas, issued an opinion respecting denial. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 10:09 am by Amy Howe
” However, the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority, known as WMATA, rejected the advertisement because of its religious nature. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Lobbyists who have a smaller salary and work in specialist areas or for public interest groups are less overconfident, or even underestimate their success. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Note: The author thanks Brittany Moore for contributing to statutory research for this piece. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:13 pm by Greg Mersol
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Civil Action No. 15-2092 (RBW) (D.D.C. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 10:23 am by Admin
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, the plaintiff Veronica Tinsley was at the Cheverly Metro Station in Maryland when she slipped and fell on the wet platform. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:51 am by admin
If those who govern the District of Columbia decide that the Nation’s Capital should be beautiful as well as sanitary, there is nothing in the Fifth Amendment that stands in the way. [read post]