Search for: "Do v. Mills" Results 1 - 20 of 1,621
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The dominant modalities, importantly, do not include the types of arguments that, as Pozen shows, might have best articulated the flaws in our regime of punitive prohibitionism—policy arguments, particularly cost-benefit analysis; and “fundamentalist” arguments that draw on philosophical premises, like John Stuart Mill’s harm principle. [read post]
6 May 2024, 3:32 am by Peter J. Sluka
In opposition, Farro argued that any flaws in the expert’s projections were grist for the mill at trial, not grounds to exclude the DCF calculation altogether. [read post]
5 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
[V]iolent protest is not protected; peaceful protest is. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
The regulation is part of an effort to preserve the reproductive rights of women in the aftermath of the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am by Fred Wertheimer
As the cases cited above reveal, the Supreme Court can and has moved quickly when circumstances call for it to do so. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 7:01 am by Richard Worsfold
Justice Dietrich noted the principles that she had set out in Henderson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 11:49 am by Mills & Mills LLP
The material provided through the Mills & Mills LLP website is for general information purposes only. [read post]