Search for: "Doe v. Black" Results 1 - 20 of 6,871
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2024, 5:11 am by Michael Oykhman
For example, the court in a case known as R v Patrick, 2007 CanLII 7579 (ONSC), noted that “carrying does not require personal possession”. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
” Unlike federal RICO, Georgia’s law does not require proving continuity over an extended period – even a short pattern of related crimes can qualify. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
” Unlike federal RICO, Georgia’s law does not require proving continuity over an extended period – even a short pattern of related crimes can qualify. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
” Unlike federal RICO, Georgia’s law does not require proving continuity over an extended period – even a short pattern of related crimes can qualify. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 9:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Well, it doesn't protect that speech from the landowner's decision about what to exclude; the Klan, for instance, had no First Amendment right to force the Cana, Virginia property owner in Black v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:26 am by Tobin Admin
The defendant police officer saw a black object in his hand that he thought was a gun. [read post]
31 May 2024, 4:29 am by Verena von Bomhard (BomhardIP)
In other words, while the reputation of the trademark applied for does not have an impact on the overall appreciation of likelihood of confusion, it does matter for the comparison of the signs. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:34 am by Alex Phipps
At some point during the night, the victim blacked out, and woke up in defendant’s car with him on top of her. [read post]