Search for: "Doe v. Board of Elections" Results 1 - 20 of 2,806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am by Scott Bomboy
Zane created public Facebook pages to promote their school board campaigns and used the same pages after their election to post updates on board activities and to ask for public comments. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
On February 23, 2024, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its decision in West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
26 May 2024, 6:57 am by Marie Nganele
Is this considered a material alteration, and does it require a 75% vote of all residents? [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
As a reminder, when confronted with a demand for recognition, the Board’s decision in Cemex requires employers to either grant voluntary recognition and bargain with the union or file an RM petition to seek a government-supervised secret ballot election. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am by husovec
If it does, the Election Guidance in itself will not be sufficient to create some minimum expectations of risk mitigation. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Distinctions can be justified in some cases. 'The doctrine of the equality of States . . . does not bar . . . remedies for local evils which have subsequently appeared,' (citation to South Carolina v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Owns or Operates Financial Services Sector Infrastructure The entity owns or operates any legal entity that qualifies as one or more of the financial services entities specified in the Proposed Regulation, including (i) A banking or other organization regulated by the OCC, the Federal Reserve Board, or the FDIC under certain regulations; (ii) A federally insured credit union regulated by the NCUA under a specific regulation; (iii) A designated contract market, swap execution facility,… [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm by Josh Blackman
I can see Justice Kavanaugh writing a concurrence explaining that the clear statement rule should apply across the board, relying on Franklin v. [read post]