Search for: "Does 1-12" Results 1 - 20 of 28,752
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 7:44 am by Cyberleagle
  Echoing S.13(4), S.12 provides that material is ‘removed’ if “the material is neither accessible to, nor delivered to, any of the end-users in Australia using the service. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., ¶¶ 127-128; NYSCEF Doc No. 50, Wright amended answer, exhibit 12). [read post]
21 May 2024, 10:46 am by bklemm@foley.com
  The Notice does so by providing a new safe harbor that taxpayers may use to calculate the inputs for satisfying the Manufactured Products Requirement for solar, wind, and storage projects (the “New Elective Safe Harbor”). [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am by itars sis
Nevertheless, the AI Office’s role does not imply to verify or proceed to “a work-by-work assessment of the training data in terms of copyright compliance. [read post]
ASIC submitted the Notification Clause was unfair within the meaning of ss 12BF(1)(a) and 12BG(1) of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) (ASIC Act) on the basis that it: imposed an unclear disclosure obligation on the insured; suggested that Auto & General had a broader right to refuse or reduce claims than permitted under the ASIC Act; and was liable to mislead or confuse insureds as to their rights and obligations under the contract. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
In this section, I list some methodologies that (1) have been widely accepted, (2) can be implemented in a highly efficient manner, and (3) are highly informative for the initial economic assessment stage. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:27 pm by Marcel Pemsel
According to the CJEU, merely continuing the use of the designer’s name as a trade mark after their departure from the company does constitute neither an absolute ground for refusal/invalidity under Art. 4(1)(g) TMD nor a ground for revocation under Art. 12(2)(b) of Directive 2008/95/EC. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Nov 21, 2023 | Does Industry Self-Regulation of Mental Health Apps Protect Consumers? [read post]