Search for: "Doty v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:34 am
Doty. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:25 am
Doty Bros. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:25 am
Doty Bros. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
And here’s United States District Judge David S. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 3:08 am
An issue of the day was Guantánamo; specifically, what was the United States to do now that the U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
Misclassification of employees as independent contractors is found in an increasing number of workplaces in the United States, in part reflecting larger restructuring of business organizations. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Government Ordered to Maintain Expensive Custom Database Shared with Criminal Defendant: In the criminal case of United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:22 pm
The specific stand of forest at issue (the “LSFS”) was located on a 17-acre section of Unit 9 in the Doty Creek Watershed, and was determined by DFW to meet the FPR’s “structural definition of Late Succession Forest Stands. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 4:34 am
PCAOB Chairman Doty remarked that the proposed standards - running to almost 300 pages - mark a "watershed moment" for auditing in the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:56 am
” (United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
")And the result in Habyarimana v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:17 pm
Associate Editor in Chief Jim Jones penned the second article, “United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:17 pm
Associate Editor in Chief Jim Jones penned the second article, “United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:28 pm
A video about her and her family, prepared for the event, is here, and here's a video of Pat discussing overincarceration in the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 3:14 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
Discon, Inc., 525 U.S. 128 (1998), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that: [P]recedent limits the per se rule in the boycott context to cases involving horizontal agreements among direct competitors. [. . .] [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 7:07 am
The recent opinion of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in Doty v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:07 am
Currently, Title 42 United States Code Section 264 charges the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) with "preventing the introduction, transmission, and spread of communicable diseases from foreign countries into the United States and within the United States and its territories/possessions. [read post]
