Search for: "Dunn v. Felt"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
One California-based firm, Gibson Dunn, did offer O’Connor a job – as a legal secretary. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
He claimed that he was identifiable as the person concerned, and he felt he had no choice but to issue a statement denying the allegations. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In 1878, in Reynolds v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
” Pomerantz also acknowledges that “the conversation with the ‘brain trust’ had left [Dunne] ‘on the fence’ about charging Trump. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36] (O’Donnell J)… [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 3:24 am
You might have read about the Supreme Court’s decision in Davis v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Also, Thomas’ persona is so present throughout his opinions, his self is so stamped on the page, that I felt there was no need to talk to him. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 4:42 pm
Furthermore, The Sun explicitly acknowledges that Ben Stokes has never “spoken publicly” about the matter and that the main source of the story, Jacqui Dunn, the daughter of Andrew Dunn, was doing so for the “first time”. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 8:24 am
First was Dunn v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
Hardin went home, and made a list of who he felt were the worst of the worst. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm
Finally, last night in Dunn v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm
Finally, last night in Dunn v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
University of Texas and its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In 2003, in Grutter v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 8:18 pm
(Schnatter v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 3:30 am
Mackintosh v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
However, when convinced of former error, this Court has never felt constrained to follow precedent. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
And, most famously, in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
” The court also found it irrelevant that the churchgoers ostensibly felt coerced by their pastor—who recruited them from the pulpit every Sunday— into volunteering their labor, as the DOL had argued, since “spiritual coercion” is not in the agency’s domain, a concurring opinion explained (Acosta v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm
Erwin, drawing on one episode that arose when he was a faculty member at the University of Southern California and a more recent one in the short time he has been at Berkeley, felt it was a dean’s job to speak out and condemn prominent expressions of bigotry and intolerance that take place at a law school in a way that makes them highly visible to the community, even though those expressions in many cases might have been perfectly constitutionally protected (and thus immune from… [read post]
