Search for: "Eugene Mueller"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2023, 3:06 pm
At the end of the meeting, Undersheriff Sung brought up the upcoming election for sheriff and asked Gullo and Mueller if they would support Sheriff Smith's re-election. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:28 am
Mueller (E.D. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 7:11 am
I thought I'd pass along a long excerpt from this amicus brief, which my students Samantha Frazier, Katelyn Taira, and Jacob Haas and I wrote on behalf of the First Amendment Coalition and myself; for more on the decision below, which indeed rejected pseudonymity, see here. [* * *] Summary of Argument John Doe is trying to punish Jane Doe … for accusing him of sexual assault. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
This new article of mine will be coming out next year in the Journal of Law and Religion, and I thought I'd serialize it here; there's still plenty of time for editing, so I'd love to hear people's feedback. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 4:51 am
Vote, decided Tuesday by Judge Kimberly Jo Mueller (E.D. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 9:45 am
Mueller: [The Plaintiff's complaint alleges:] Plaintiff identifies as a businessman who "as a hobby … used various social media platforms" to discuss topics like politics, religion, and world history. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
I remember seeing then-FBI Director Robert Mueller, just a few days into his tenure, walking briskly past our office on the floor of SIOC. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 7:24 pm
Mueller, No. 06-1931 (JAF), 2007 WL 5312566 (D.P.R. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:41 am
To the extent Corsi contends that the implication of the statement was that he had assisted the Mueller investigation in an attempt to harm Roger Stone and Donald Trump, that implication is not apparent from anything alleged in the Amended Complaint, and Corsi fails to demonstrate how, even assuming the implication was made, the statement is defamatory…. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:18 pm
It seems likely that if and when President Trump is put on trial in the Senate for high crimes and misdemeanors, his lawyers will argue that the president was exercising his First Amendment right to free speech in the weeks after the election—and, as a consequence, his words cannot form the basis of an impeachable offense. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:57 am
The House did not adopt articles of impeachment focusing on obstruction of justice based on the Mueller Report or on the Emoluments Clauses. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm
Exploring pathology can help us appreciate proper physiological function, and how normal functioning can be lost. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:08 pm
Exploring pathology can help us appreciate proper physiological function, and how normal functioning can be lost. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 10:43 am
Mueller should have charged Trump campaign officials with it. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
People that have secrets are equally concerned with Facebook because of the power it gives an average joe … so socialize, enjoy, and post photos … The great equalizer is the gun but Facebook runs a close 2nd … and what you need is there … ready to be revealed … God willing … The government alleges Cook posted the following on Facebook on August 19, 20191: Cowards Creekmore and Mueller [presumably referring to the prosecutors in Cook's state… [read post]
22 May 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal Appeals Court Greenlights Emoluments Suit against Trump Politico – Josh Gerstein | Published: 5/14/2020 A lawsuit accusing President Trump of violating the Constitution by accepting foreign government money through his Washington, D.C. hotel can proceed to fact-gathering about Trump’s profits, a federal appeals court ruled. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:53 am
Mueller, decided Wednesday by a Pennsylvania Superior Court appellate panel: On June 8, 2018, police conducted a traffic stop in Brookhaven Borough. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm
Mueller testified that President Donald J. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 6:07 am
[Law360] * Eugene Scalia is already caught up in a conflict of interest problem, completing the traditional rite of passage for a member of this administration. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:05 am
Gandy writes that “Thomas is correct in noting that Sanger ‘recognized the eugenic potential for her cause,’ but the conclusions that he draws from that recognition are wrong. [read post]
