Search for: "Ex Parte Phillips" Results 1 - 20 of 261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2009, 4:33 am
The State of California incarcerated Phillip Harbin for the 1994 offense of annoying or molesting a child under 18 and the 1988 offense of engaging in lewd and lascivious acts with a child under 14. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 10:05 am by Silver Law Group
The lawsuit, filed on November 12, 2019 in the Northern District of Florida, claims that Phillip Timothy Howard (Tim Howard) defrauded our client of more than $500,000 as part of a real estate fraud scheme. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 6:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Next step: I would also propose using the Phillips standard during regular ex parte prosecution. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 1:06 pm
For the four or five convicted and confined servicemembers who have not paid contingent fines, who have internet access, who are not concerned with ex-parte communications with convicted servicemembers, and are reading this blog, there may be a convening authority somewhere that is watching. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 10:15 am by Eric Caligiuri
As to the dispute, a third-party had requested ex parte reexamination of the ’953 patent, which was granted. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
Angela Phillips in the author of Journalism in Context, Routledge. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 4:34 am by INFORRM
The BBC’s head of news, James Harding, is an ex-editor of the Conservative-supporting newspaper the Times (which is part of the Murdoch empire). [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:45 am by Mark Terry
In Ex parte Benson, the BPAI explored the issue of how the claim term "embedded" should be construed. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:21 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Within Ex parte INTERACTIVE TELEVISION COMPANY, LLC [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 7:23 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Phillips, 455 U.S. 209, 215–17 (1982), a point Chief Judge Batchelder stressed in her concurrence.I don’t know the case law in this area to know which side offers the better interpretation of the Supreme Court’s precedent or how such ex parte communications should be handled. [read post]