Search for: "FISH v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 3,402
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Applying the principles set out by the Supreme Court in Fish & Fish v Sea Shepherd UK[1], Meade J found the former went no further than “mere facilitation” and thus no joint liability, whereas the latter amounted to assisting customers pursuant to a common design by working a method which would have infringed EP 572. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:33 am by Dan Farber
Although temporary flooding was not previously considered to be a taking, the Court reversed its position on that issue in Arkansas Game & Fish Comm’n v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:28 pm by michael
Eating cheddar bay biscuits and choosing your dinner from a fish tank are commonly-shared experiences across the United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Many people in Canada declined to become vaccinated for COVID-19, some of them for religious reasons, which resulted in job losses, an issue that was raised in the case of Ontario Nurses’ Association v North East Home and Community Care Support Services. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Many people in Canada declined to become vaccinated for COVID-19, some of them for religious reasons, which resulted in job losses, an issue that was raised in the case of Ontario Nurses’ Association v North East Home and Community Care Support Services. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm by NARF
(Tribal Water Rights; Fiduciary Duties; Administrative Record) Wild Fish Conservancy v. [read post]