Search for: "FLOOD v. HUNTER" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2022, 1:16 pm by Benjamin Pollard
ICYMI: This Weekend on Lawfare Kyleanne Hunter discussed the potential impacts that overturning Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Recent cases citing these rights together include Watson v Campos [2016] IEHC 18 (14 January 2016) [28] (Barrett J); Rooney v Shell E&P Ireland [2017] IEHC 63 (20 January 2017) [31]-[32] (Ní Raifeartaigh J); Ryanair v Channel 4 Television [2017] IEHC 651 (05 October 2017) [49]-[52] (Meenan J). [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Smith for their insightful critiques of my book, Gay Rights v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:21 am by Jim Martin
In the court’s decision, Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 9:57 am by Michael Madison
We will continue to feel good about high-profile pro bono efforts, but pro se litigants will continue to flood the courthouses while other individuals fail even to seek justice. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by INFORRM
And, in the application of Jameel, the UK Supreme Court in Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] 2 AC 273, [2012] UKSC 11 (21 March 2012) provided significant latitude to editorial judgment. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:00 am by John Gregory
Among the many peaceful uses of drones are surveying, especially of hard-to-access or remote lands and installations like pipelines; border patrols; inspection of emergency situations like fires or floods, searching for missing persons, general photography, and household maintenance (check your third-floor eavestroughs). [read post]
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
” Now, anyone who knows anything about patent judges will know that they love experts who give their evidence in a moderate and balanced fashion and are willing to concede points where it is reasonable to do so – see for example Mr Justice Arnold’s comments about Professor Hunter in GUK v Yeda. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Nat
  Both absentee state legislators and judicial candidates who show their responsiveness to the legislating of judicial outcomes that were uniquely anti-plaintiff in tort cases were flooded with campaign money. [read post]