Search for: "Fast v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,579
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2024, 8:48 pm
Fast forward to NRA v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 7:30 am
Note that McCray v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:59 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:27 pm
See, Gideon v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am
They were using their shoes to try and empty the boat, but it was not fast enough, the water was coming in too quickly. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm
It’s true that CFPB v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm
On April 23, 2024, the U.S. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:16 pm
In Eisenhauer v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:00 am
Nix v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:26 am
The efficient markets hypothesis is over 50 years old.Basic v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:26 am
Cline’s counsel (perhaps unwisely) spent the large majority of his time trying to convince the Court that the LP Agreement “was not signed” by Cline, an argument going nowhere fast. [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:28 am
State. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
State and Local Preemption. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:41 am
” “The Court stated that while ‘there is no hard and fast rule that requires financial advisors to always disclose the specific amount of their fees from a counterparty in a transaction,’ the question is subject to a materiality standard. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:56 pm
[2] Herbert Morris Ltd v Saxelby [1916] 1 AC 688. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm
E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]