Search for: "Federal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2022, 7:47 am
It is not unheard of for settlements to fall into place during a trial, such as between Qualcomm and Apple in 2019 (I was at the federal courthouse in San Diego when the news suddenly broke). [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:30 pm
Qualcomm Inc., 992 F.3d 1378, 1385 (Fed. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:15 am
Federal Trade Commission, No. 21-406 (reverse payment patent settlement). [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:20 am
For example, in Qualcomm’s 2019 Ninth Circuit opening brief in its litigation against the Federal Trade Commission, Qualcomm contended its “OEM licenses are efficient[.] [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am
In the Federal Trade Commission’s litigation against Qualcomm, Judge Koh addressed the first argument on a summary judgment motion, concluding that Qualcomm’s FRAND commitments under the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) and Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions (ATIS) Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) policies require Qualcomm to license its SEPs to modem chip suppliers. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 1:08 am
The Federal Trade Commission and Apple had a Common Interest Agreement in place against Qualcomm, to give just one example. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
By way of comparison, in 2019 there were 62 federal court securities suits against non-U.S. companies, representing about 15% of all federal court securities suit filings in 2019. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 8:25 am
The answer is that the federal courts over time have misunderstood and misapplied the Supreme Court’s landmark 2006 decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am
Abstract: On August 11, 2020, the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 9:59 pm
Noonan -- The Federal Trade Commission has a history of taking positions and aggressively pursuing them, despite getting reversed (sometimes continually) by Circuit Courts (see "Reverse Payments in Generic Drug Settlements"), although occasionally finding an ally in the Supreme Court (see "Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
Brief of the United States and the Federal Trade Commission as Amici Curiae Supporting Plaintiffs-Appellees, Teladoc, Inc. v Texas Medical Board, No. 16-50017 (5th Cir. filed Sept. 9, 2016). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 8:50 am
In its answering brief to Qualcomm's Ninth Circuit antitrust appeal, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) downplays the importance of Judge Lucy H. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:36 pm
Late on Friday, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed its answering brief to Qualcomm's appeal (this post continues below the document):19-11-22 FTC Answering Brie... by Florian Mueller on ScribdThe part I'm most interested in--as always in this context--is chipset-level licensing. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 10:00 pm
Samsung used to be a party to the proceedings relating to the 2016 decision, but dropped out after effectively settling its dispute with Qualcomm throuhg a new commercial deal in 2018 that involved not only patent licenses but also the use of Samsung's foundry by Qualcomm.Testimony from Samsung and LG, and documents referring to Samsung and LG, also played a role in last month's U.S. antitrust trial (Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 7:05 am
Cal. 2018) In an important decision, Judge Koh granted partial summary judgment for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that will require Qualcomm to license its Standard-EssentialPatents (SEPs) for 3G Mobile (and other) communication standards on fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) terms. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
Qualcomm, 501 F.3d 297, 314 (3d Cir. 2007); Microsoft Mobile v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:08 am
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, on Thursday, April 5, 2018 Tags: Bitcoin, Blockchain, CFTC, Contracts, Cryptocurrency, Derivatives, Financial regulation, Futures, Incentives, Innovation, Investor protection, Jurisdiction, Oversight, Securities regulation Texas Gulf Sulphur and the Genesis of Corporate Liability Under Rule 10b-5 Posted by A.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
FTC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am
Qualcomm Inc. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:31 am
Sept. 12, 2007) (granting stay requested by wireless carriers and handset manufacturers);Dynatec Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
