Search for: "Field Research Corp. v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am
Oreskes’ “reading and thinking” had never been peer-reviewed, had no known success rate, and could not be replicated by other experts in her field. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 9:07 am
“[T]he court shall assign each spouse’s non-marital property to that spouse. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Cheng claims that his proposed Consensus Rule is epistemically superior to Rule 702 gatekeeping. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Leading that field is Professor Levinson, who published a seminal article forty years ago.[3]It can be summarized as follows.[4]Modern linguistic and literary theorists deny that an interpreter can ascertain a text’s objective meaning. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596, 606 (1982); Volokh is included in both those categories. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Supreme Court explained in Campbell v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
In setting forth this law, the Pennsylvania Superior Court in this case quoted extensively from the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in the case of Walsh Estate of Walsh v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
For example, in Triplett v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
Marine Corps. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Minimum required knowledge & experience: Basic knowledge of international law, international institutions, IHL, and a related legal field (e.g. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm
REQUIRED KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE: J.D. or other advanced degree in public policy, international affairs, human rights, national security, or another relevant field. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm
REQUIRED KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE: J.D. or other advanced degree in public policy, international affairs, human rights, national security, or another relevant field. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 7:08 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am
.: CSIS will host a conversation with Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
