Search for: "Fitzgibbon v. Fitzgibbon" Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2020, 8:38 am by Bruce Zagaris
  See also Will Fitzgibbon, Switzerland freezes Angolan tycoon’s $900 million fortune, ICIJ, Aug. 28, 2020. 3]  Judgment, paragr. g.b. on p. 4 and Fitzgibbon, supra. [4]  Fitzgibbon, supra. [5]  Id. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 8:38 am by Bruce Zagaris
  See also Will Fitzgibbon, Switzerland freezes Angolan tycoon’s $900 million fortune, ICIJ, Aug. 28, 2020. 3]  Judgment, paragr. g.b. on p. 4 and Fitzgibbon, supra. [4]  Fitzgibbon, supra. [5]  Id. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
A couple of months ago, I blogged about FitzGibbon v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Radack sought a restraining order against FitzGibbon based on that, claiming that this violated Virginia's "revenge porn" statute—but the D.C. court disagreed (Radack v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Nonetheless, promises not to speak are legally binding (see Cohen v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgment in media law cases are outstanding: OPO v MLA, heard 19 and 20 January 2015 (UK Supreme Court) Murray v Associated Newspapers, heard 21 January 2015 (Longmore, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Coulson v Wilby heard 6 March 2015 (Warby J). [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am by Jag
 If that were the case we would not have had decisions such as S & Marper v UK – which declared unlawful the indefinite retention of DNA samples by police of individuals who had not been convicted of any offences. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am by Jag
 If that were the case we would not have had decisions such as S & Marper v UK – which declared unlawful the indefinite retention of DNA samples by police of individuals who had not been convicted of any offences. [read post]