Search for: "Frank v. Commissioner of Public Safety" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” The OCC further notes in the letter that it is “committed to preserving the legal framework for preemption established by Congress, including in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
From Magistrate Judge Robert Norway's report and recommendation in Frank v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has released updated opinions on what online services need to do to comply with the Online Safety Act. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The new policy claims the collection of biometric information is “for safety, security, and identification purposes. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm by NARF
Frank (Indian Civil Rights Act; Probation Revocation) Williams v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
The regulatory framework consists of five AI principles: safety, transparency, fairness, accountability and governance, and redress. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The appellant instead relied on O’Connor v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am by Sherron Watkins
Congress does actually attempt to legislate for the safety and well-being of U.S. citizens in their efforts to ensure we have safe food and pharmaceuticals, and trustworthy capital markets, among many ot [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Guest Opinion
Hahn, M.D., with an introduction by Deputy Commissioner for Food Policy and Response Frank Yiannas (https://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am by Schachtman
PL [Peter Lurie] is with Public Citizen’s Health Research Group. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm by Unknown
Even absence of explicit falsity can be misleading overall and potentially harmful to public health by series of statements each true on its own but misleading overall in combination w/omissions. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am by David Greene
Sullivan.2 The Court’s joint opinion escalated the standards required of defamation lawsuits brought by public figures, protecting the rights of both the public and the press to criticize the operations of government. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:25 am by David Kopel
The chief reliance of the citizens lay in the Committee of Safety. [read post]