Search for: "Franks v. American Medical Systems, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
[FN2]Plaintiffs IntegrateNYC, Inc., a youth led organization "for racial integration and equity in New York City schools," two parent organizations, and current and former public school students commenced this lawsuit against the State and the City actors that oversee New York City's public education system. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
[FN2]Plaintiffs IntegrateNYC, Inc., a youth led organization "for racial integration and equity in New York City schools," two parent organizations, and current and former public school students commenced this lawsuit against the State and the City actors that oversee New York City's public education system. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Meanwhile, the Chief Justice, taking a page from the Law Society Tribunal or other better developed court systems, recently spoke about the need to ensure cases move through the system in an efficient manner, and that court time is used effectively[20]. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Frank S. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
During oral argument, plaintiff's attorney confirmed that no statutory or regulatory violation had been or could be asserted, that plaintiff had only a medical negligence claim for the alleged treatment Burns received at Care One, and that he anticipated his experts may refer to a breach of statutes or regulations as evidence of the applicable standard of care. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:47 am
Statesman in Healthcare Administration Award,” presented by the American Academy of Medical Administrators. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:32 am
With an estimated 43.3 million Americans using the elicited drug, and the challenges of the “opioid epidemic” creating massive addiction and fatal results, the nation’s workers’ compensation system has been challenged to provide adequate authorized medical treatment. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 4:31 am
Emily Hammond analyzes the argument in Monday’s second case, Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
Ratliff, Frank N. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:04 am
Motorola, Inc., 218 F. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
See Stewart v. 104 Wallace St., Inc., 87 N.J. 146 (1981). [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm
Department of Justice (DOJ) asking the Court to rehear U.S. v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 1:04 am
Never too late 91 [week ending on Sunday 10 April] - The Future of second-medical-use patents, Fordham 2016|AG Opinion in United Video Properties, Inc v Telenet NV, C-57/15|Batman v Superman in commercial context| Trade Secrets and the Bio-Pharmaceutical industry| Panorama and the three step test in the Swedish Supreme Court| Public consultation on the Enforcement Directive| Hyperlinks in GS Media, C-160/15 | Life as… [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
FRANCISCO "FRANK" LOPEZ, Respondent. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
And even in law, there are limits to this adversarial system. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
: an introduction to the American legal system / John A. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
Next: Medical company Kinetic Concepts, Inc. [read post]
